GetDizzy's Profile
Reputation: 50
Excellent
- Group:
- DigiStaff
- Active Posts:
- 3,560 (0.41 per day)
- Most Active In:
- The Junkyard (1408 posts)
- Joined:
- 22-November 01
- Profile Views:
- 564,271
- Last Active:
Jun 18 2025 12:50 AM
- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Touch Fuzzy.
- Age:
- 37 years old
- Birthday:
- December 28, 1987
- Gender:
-
Other
- Location:
- MA
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
- Website URL:
-
http://
Previous Fields
- Xbox Live! Name:
- Blindhammer611
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: MegaZeux 2.93d
10 June 2025 - 03:48 AM
As usual, debug symbols for Debian/Ubuntu, and Debian Testing packages (not otherwise linked on the vault), are available in my pinned companion thread. -
In Topic: MegaZeux 2.93d .debs for Debian/Ubuntu/Raspbian
09 June 2025 - 10:57 PM
Updated for 2.93d. Ubuntu "interim" release changed from Oracular to Plucky. -
In Topic: MegaZeux 2.93d .debs for Debian/Ubuntu/Raspbian
01 March 2025 - 05:50 AM
All packages updated for 2.93c (internally 2.93.2 to dpkg now). Builds for Ubuntu i386 have ceased as previously announced. -
In Topic: MegaZeux 2.93c
01 March 2025 - 05:42 AM
NB the way the Debian/Ubuntu builds treat their version numbers internally to the package manager has changed. This was done because of an issue wherein e.g. 2.93 would be seen as a newer build than 2.93b due to the way Debian treats version numbers.
2.93c is now "2.93.2" internally, and should be treated as a newer version than 2.93 or 2.93b by your package manager.
This change will be permanent going forward, and e.g., 2.94 will be 2.94.0 as far as the Debian/Ubuntu package manager is concerned.
This is also reflected in the filenames as these are generated automatically.
Also, Ubuntu non-LTS releases (year.10) are marked as "interim" in the filename as this was the only generic name for "non-LTS releases of ubuntu" I could find in common use on the net, and my build chroots, the name of which is automatically added to the deb filename by my scripts, have been made generic to lower my maintenance burden. -
In Topic: ZZT Bind in MZX?
23 October 2024 - 04:42 AM
Worth noting that you seem to have misread the note you're talking about, specifically you read it backwards.
Quoting the help file here:
Quote
NOTE: DO NOT normally use COPY # # # # to copy Robots; use
DUPLICATE SELF or COPYROBOT. It is useful for copying by Robot
id, however; use COPY rN.thisx and rN.thisy as the first pair
of coordinates.
Comments
Bramble
29 Mar 2022 - 09:15Bramble
29 Mar 2022 - 09:13